‘Complete double standard’: Tobacco giant opposed rules in Africa that are mandatory in UK

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “utter hypocrisy” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the African officials demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks modifications of a proposed legislation that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any businesses disregarding the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” stated the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to WHO calculations.

The advocate mentioned the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulation among community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during wider concerns about business sector influence with medical guidelines. Last month, global health authorities issued a warning that the cigarette manufacturers was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“There is proof of business advocacy globally. Corporate signatures are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” stated the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be decreased to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum one year after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the cigarette package face “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. In the UK, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavored tobacco discussion

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. It suggests prohibiting a smaller list of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The draft bill recommends punishments for multiple violations “extending from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.

Business explanation

In the letter, the company executive of the Zambian branch claims the corporation is focused on ethical business practices” and “backs the goals of governments to reduce smoking incidence and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

Chimbala said the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the impact needed for it to create lasting transformation in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We reside in a international community. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and gather the crop and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself total emotional bankruptcy.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Official corporate statement

The corporate communicator said: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Additionally, the company participates in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which enable interested party involvement in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, they said, adding that young individuals should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to realize planned population health targets, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, adding that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which encompasses rising levels of illicit trade”.

The country's office of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.

Sarah Jackson
Sarah Jackson

A Berlin-based tech journalist and software developer with over 8 years of experience in digital innovation and cybersecurity.