🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average worker. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

According to recent research, the average family spends $27,000 annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 per employee in 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to political disagreements over subsidies which analysts predict could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I'm convinced we're approaching that point because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee earning moderate income pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare that with what average American pays. I know dozens of businesses that are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with supporting medical services. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It should be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and employer contribution. And, like much of our government's defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make management significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of going through the complex (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of current options. And there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's clear that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning effectively. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would still be a better and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations with the best healthcare globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and agree that major reforms need to happen.