🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – going beyond who would win overall, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win while missing the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where election day turned out kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and massively expanded his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, youthful, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump last year backed the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3 million – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus it’s not it’s definitive, but I believe probable, and I hope he achieves it so then none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That really surprised me. The independent held very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained many Republicans on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was significant strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and homeowners all went for Cuomo. Thus there was some opposition. However no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on if the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises on this one, but he did hold more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that each urban center in the US could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the epicenters of leftwing power in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where people are crushed by the inequalities exist.